|
Almost every day, my desk is besieged with literature from consulting firms promising quick and easy "Quality Accreditation." Typically, this sales literature is also accompanied by a quote from a satisfied customer who swears that his or her recent quality accreditation increased efficiency by X% and sales by X%. Although the quality system acronyms may change (ISO 9000, ISO 9001, A2LA, NVLAP, etc.), the message is clear: You need these letters after your company's name or you'll be passed over by potential customers. The price, you ask? The hazing ritual known as "The Accreditation Process." As many of you know, this process is a costly and almost necessary affair for those companies involved in the quality industry. Customers such as the Big Three automakers and their numerous second-tier suppliers require accreditation as a necessary step prior to conducting business. Right or wrong, this requirement is simply the state of affairs in a modern business atmosphere and the modern businessperson would do well to recognize this fact. Though I am by no means an expert in the field of quality accreditation, suffice it to say, process documentation and standardization are considered two of the most holy commandments of the accreditation process. Additionally, the requirement of specific proficiency testing of key personnel at preset intervals is another hallmark of the modern quality invasion. Increased process documentation, proficiency testing, and accreditation and re-accreditation fees cost money. Many smaller businesses – such as stand-alone metrology labs – have had no choice but to swallow a substantial cost-of-business increase or close up shop. The net affect has been to create a more streamlined business climate in the metrology world – the weak perish and the strong survive. This is not necessarily a bad thing, though. The labs that can afford the cost of accreditation usually are the ones that also can afford the other high fixed costs of running a climate-controlled metrology lab: specialized climate-control systems, proper metrology equipment, trained and qualified metrology technicians, etc. These labs generally will produce the most accurate measurements. It seems that the days of a mom-and-pop garage or basement operation are passing us by and Darwinism is the call of the day. Assuming that you have survived the process and costs (time and money) and have attained quality accreditation, you still need to be accurate and prove it to your customers. Quality documentation and testing is helpful, but it's not the panacea many think it is.
Getting Down to Business: Choosing the Lab
1. Choose an Accredited Lab.
2. Check out the potential lab for its accreditations and
accuracies.
3. Review the actual certifications you'll be receiving and consider
your own particular audit trail needs.
4. Review the lab's quality manual and book of procedures.
5. Visit the lab and find out the experience levels of the
technicians who will be performing measurements on your company's
equipment.
6. Perform a "Round Robin" and check the accuracy of the lab you're
considering against other labs or NIST.
7. Check the financial status of the lab.
8. Make sure the calibration lab you're considering maintains
calibration records for as long as you need to have them for your
auditors. Finally, and perhaps more important, choose a lab you have confidence in. The more research you perform, the higher your confidence level should be when you make your decision. And the more comfortable you'll feel working with the lab. About the Author Rob Edmunds III has a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics and Business from Villanova University. Involved with many facets of the gaging industry, he also participates in national and regional industry associations. Currently vice president of Edmunds Gages, he can be reached during normal business hours at Edmunds Gages or via email at REdmundsIII@edmundsgages.com. |
|
|
Farmington Industrial Park • 45 Spring Lane • Farmington, CT
USA 06032
TEL (860) 677-2813 • FAX (860) 677-4243 |
|